<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Riding On Our COETAILs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.coetail.com/chamada/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.coetail.com/chamada</link>
	<description>Just another COETAIL site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 15:06:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Innovative Learning Grants by Clint Hamada</title>
		<link>http://www.coetail.com/chamada/2013/01/24/innovative-learning-grants/#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>Clint Hamada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 15:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coetail.com/chamada/?p=49#comment-79</guid>
		<description>Hey Stacy!

The grants are needs/wants based, rather than a fixed amount. In my head, I always imagined an amount around $2500 (max.) to keep the projects relatively small and manageable as well as to make the teachers think creatively about what is really necessary.

And I agree that there should be a more intertwined relationship between educational technology folks and curriculum folks. I was given a new supervisor this year; instead of reporting the MSHS Principal I now report directly to the Technology Director. While this makes sense in a lot of ways, I also lobbied that I should report to the Curriculum Director instead, especially if my remit as tech facilitator is to focus on pedagogy and student learning. 

P.S. - Steal away. Just don&#039;t forget to attribute! ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Stacy!</p>
<p>The grants are needs/wants based, rather than a fixed amount. In my head, I always imagined an amount around $2500 (max.) to keep the projects relatively small and manageable as well as to make the teachers think creatively about what is really necessary.</p>
<p>And I agree that there should be a more intertwined relationship between educational technology folks and curriculum folks. I was given a new supervisor this year; instead of reporting the MSHS Principal I now report directly to the Technology Director. While this makes sense in a lot of ways, I also lobbied that I should report to the Curriculum Director instead, especially if my remit as tech facilitator is to focus on pedagogy and student learning. </p>
<p>P.S. &#8211; Steal away. Just don&#8217;t forget to attribute! <img src='http://www.coetail.com/chamada/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Innovative Learning Grants by Clint Hamada</title>
		<link>http://www.coetail.com/chamada/2013/01/24/innovative-learning-grants/#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>Clint Hamada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 15:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coetail.com/chamada/?p=49#comment-78</guid>
		<description>Marcello,

Congrats on the new position! Sounds like you&#039;re walking into a firestorm with the iPad rollout, though. That&#039;ll keep you on your toes for the first few months!

I think &quot;problem for every solution&quot; is the perfect way to describe the attitude of some. Hopefully we can alleviate some of that with more ownership of the process by teachers. Like I said, this is only the first year and since I&#039;m leaving in June I&#039;m a bit sad that I won&#039;t get to see how it plays out first hand. Hopefully some of the reports will be made public as a model for other schools to adapt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marcello,</p>
<p>Congrats on the new position! Sounds like you&#8217;re walking into a firestorm with the iPad rollout, though. That&#8217;ll keep you on your toes for the first few months!</p>
<p>I think &#8220;problem for every solution&#8221; is the perfect way to describe the attitude of some. Hopefully we can alleviate some of that with more ownership of the process by teachers. Like I said, this is only the first year and since I&#8217;m leaving in June I&#8217;m a bit sad that I won&#8217;t get to see how it plays out first hand. Hopefully some of the reports will be made public as a model for other schools to adapt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Innovative Learning Grants by Stacy Stephens</title>
		<link>http://www.coetail.com/chamada/2013/01/24/innovative-learning-grants/#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacy Stephens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 11:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coetail.com/chamada/?p=49#comment-77</guid>
		<description>Such a great idea, how much are the individual grants or are they need based?  I also really appreciate that you intentionally left technology out of the grant title, I think this is the shift you see in technology...what will should we call Technology Departments? I always have the bent that we have the teaching and learning in the curriculum sphere, but really a lot of the innovative ideas are coming from the technology folks. I think these two should be blended into 1 office of teaching and learning and the two should be seen as integrated and integral rather than separate and disconnected.

I may steal your idea!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Such a great idea, how much are the individual grants or are they need based?  I also really appreciate that you intentionally left technology out of the grant title, I think this is the shift you see in technology&#8230;what will should we call Technology Departments? I always have the bent that we have the teaching and learning in the curriculum sphere, but really a lot of the innovative ideas are coming from the technology folks. I think these two should be blended into 1 office of teaching and learning and the two should be seen as integrated and integral rather than separate and disconnected.</p>
<p>I may steal your idea!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Innovative Learning Grants by Marcello Mongardi</title>
		<link>http://www.coetail.com/chamada/2013/01/24/innovative-learning-grants/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcello Mongardi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 11:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coetail.com/chamada/?p=49#comment-76</guid>
		<description>Hi Clint,
The first part of your post, about having lots of hardware at your fingertips but nonetheless getting cranky about it, makes me wonder about where we are heading here at TAISM.  We are going 1:1 iPads in our Middle School and up to 10th grade next year (I got the job as MS tech integrator for next year, so it&#039;s my project to run!), and I can detect crankiness already.  
The notion of Learning Grants strikes me as a really smart way of diffusing the &quot;problem for every solution&quot; attitude that tech can bring out in people.  It is a very positive, professional, and to a degree rigorous way to have people consider what they want, rather than whinge about what they are missing.
Always good to read your writing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Clint,<br />
The first part of your post, about having lots of hardware at your fingertips but nonetheless getting cranky about it, makes me wonder about where we are heading here at TAISM.  We are going 1:1 iPads in our Middle School and up to 10th grade next year (I got the job as MS tech integrator for next year, so it&#8217;s my project to run!), and I can detect crankiness already.<br />
The notion of Learning Grants strikes me as a really smart way of diffusing the &#8220;problem for every solution&#8221; attitude that tech can bring out in people.  It is a very positive, professional, and to a degree rigorous way to have people consider what they want, rather than whinge about what they are missing.<br />
Always good to read your writing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fallacies are Beautiful by Kelsey Giroux</title>
		<link>http://www.coetail.com/chamada/2012/10/18/fallacies-are-beautiful/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelsey Giroux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 05:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coetail.asia/chamada/?p=44#comment-75</guid>
		<description>Nice! One of my favorite podcasts in &quot;Skeptoid&quot;. In battling creationism and conspiracty theories the author of Skeptoid points out how to look for similar holes in arguments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice! One of my favorite podcasts in &#8220;Skeptoid&#8221;. In battling creationism and conspiracty theories the author of Skeptoid points out how to look for similar holes in arguments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Innovative Learning Grants by Jeff Utecht</title>
		<link>http://www.coetail.com/chamada/2013/01/24/innovative-learning-grants/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Utecht</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 23:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coetail.com/chamada/?p=49#comment-72</guid>
		<description>Love the idea of &quot;Learning Grants&quot; we used this model in Shanghai when we started the transition from desktop for teachers to laptops for teachers. Crazy to think that was only 6 years ago. However if a teacher wanted a laptop they could &quot;apply&quot; for a grant to get one which meant they signed up for monthly trainings with me on how to use it as well. Very successful way to deploy new technology I think and change culture. Would love to hear more about this on our next COETAILcast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love the idea of &#8220;Learning Grants&#8221; we used this model in Shanghai when we started the transition from desktop for teachers to laptops for teachers. Crazy to think that was only 6 years ago. However if a teacher wanted a laptop they could &#8220;apply&#8221; for a grant to get one which meant they signed up for monthly trainings with me on how to use it as well. Very successful way to deploy new technology I think and change culture. Would love to hear more about this on our next COETAILcast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Making &#8220;UNIS Hanoi Connect&#8221; Come Alive! by Jeff Utecht</title>
		<link>http://www.coetail.com/chamada/2012/09/16/making-unis-hanoi-connect-come-alive/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Utecht</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 16:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coetail.asia/chamada/?p=40#comment-32</guid>
		<description>Sites coming a long...these are always the toughest kind of sites to make...but I think a good clear navigation and a good search box keep these type of sites organized and you have that going for sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sites coming a long&#8230;these are always the toughest kind of sites to make&#8230;but I think a good clear navigation and a good search box keep these type of sites organized and you have that going for sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;The Death of Education, The Dawn of Learning&#8221; by Ben Thompson</title>
		<link>http://www.coetail.com/chamada/2012/03/12/the-death-of-education-the-dawn-of-learning/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Thompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 15:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coetail.asia/chamada/?p=35#comment-30</guid>
		<description>Clint,

Right on. The messiness of collaboration is where the wisdom will grow. Education is as much about the social interaction of people working together as it is about obtaining knowledge. Dewey and Vygosky pointed this out long. Their ideas about collaborative communities seem to be making a resurgence in the digital age.

Your link to Punya Mishra surprised me. I had him for a course called Learning Technology Through Design during my masters degree work through Michigan State. By far the most inspiring professor and course in the program.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clint,</p>
<p>Right on. The messiness of collaboration is where the wisdom will grow. Education is as much about the social interaction of people working together as it is about obtaining knowledge. Dewey and Vygosky pointed this out long. Their ideas about collaborative communities seem to be making a resurgence in the digital age.</p>
<p>Your link to Punya Mishra surprised me. I had him for a course called Learning Technology Through Design during my masters degree work through Michigan State. By far the most inspiring professor and course in the program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;The Death of Education, The Dawn of Learning&#8221; by Andrew Vicars</title>
		<link>http://www.coetail.com/chamada/2012/03/12/the-death-of-education-the-dawn-of-learning/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Vicars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 12:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coetail.asia/chamada/?p=35#comment-27</guid>
		<description>Whilst most technology + education videos paint a sunny picture of the future, both of these videos have strayed towards the dark side as they eagerly foretell the death of education.  

But I&#039;m not sure that education will go so willingly or as quickly as people might hope. Whilst I have several reasons why, let&#039;s take an equally dark approach and focus on power.

Education especially in the USA has become a means to deny social mobility and to retain power and wealth amongst those who currently hold it.  Although knowledge may be liberated in that anyone can access it, it is also being increasingly controlled, in that knowledge and skills are worth more depending on the source that validates them.  For example a student with a degree from Harvard, Stanford or Brown will be granted better opportunities, jobs, and wages than a student with an identical set of knowledge and skills from Nyack College, Bellevue University or Great Basin College.  How do you get a degree from Harvard, Stanford or Brown?  You pay large amounts of money for it.  Not just for college tuition but also for the tuition of the private prep schools that give you the best chance of attending one of these universities as well as paying for all the extra-curricular activities that are needed to round out your college application.  

Technology may change learning but until we change the manner within which society validates learning then education will still thrive.  Just think of your own reaction to the Dan Brown video.  Dan appears to be a motivated, intelligent young go-getter that you would like to employ or introduce to your daughter; that is until the end of the video when he declares that he has dropped out of college. Now he suddenly seems bitter and crazy.  Not that this is your fault or even true but rather this is how society has taught us to validate, and measure the worth of an individual&#039;s education and thus their worth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whilst most technology + education videos paint a sunny picture of the future, both of these videos have strayed towards the dark side as they eagerly foretell the death of education.  </p>
<p>But I&#8217;m not sure that education will go so willingly or as quickly as people might hope. Whilst I have several reasons why, let&#8217;s take an equally dark approach and focus on power.</p>
<p>Education especially in the USA has become a means to deny social mobility and to retain power and wealth amongst those who currently hold it.  Although knowledge may be liberated in that anyone can access it, it is also being increasingly controlled, in that knowledge and skills are worth more depending on the source that validates them.  For example a student with a degree from Harvard, Stanford or Brown will be granted better opportunities, jobs, and wages than a student with an identical set of knowledge and skills from Nyack College, Bellevue University or Great Basin College.  How do you get a degree from Harvard, Stanford or Brown?  You pay large amounts of money for it.  Not just for college tuition but also for the tuition of the private prep schools that give you the best chance of attending one of these universities as well as paying for all the extra-curricular activities that are needed to round out your college application.  </p>
<p>Technology may change learning but until we change the manner within which society validates learning then education will still thrive.  Just think of your own reaction to the Dan Brown video.  Dan appears to be a motivated, intelligent young go-getter that you would like to employ or introduce to your daughter; that is until the end of the video when he declares that he has dropped out of college. Now he suddenly seems bitter and crazy.  Not that this is your fault or even true but rather this is how society has taught us to validate, and measure the worth of an individual&#8217;s education and thus their worth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8216;Messing Around&#8217; More by Clint Hamada</title>
		<link>http://www.coetail.com/chamada/2012/02/19/messing-around-more/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Clint Hamada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2012 02:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coetail.asia/chamada/?p=19#comment-26</guid>
		<description>Marcello, I think that the PCK intersection is where teacher preparation programs (and hence previous waves of teachers) have put their emphasis. Truth be told, if a teacher is only going to focus on two of the three areas, I think those are the two to focus on!

That said, while those teachers may continue to be effective by previous measures (and may continue to prepare their students for university entrance requirements), I don&#039;t think they are truly providing relevant and engaging learning experiences. Until school&#039;s change what they consider to be effective  to include this third area of knowledge, teachers in general are unlikely to change. Once this shift occurs, though, it&#039;s nice to think that we will (hopefully) be well ahead of the game!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marcello, I think that the PCK intersection is where teacher preparation programs (and hence previous waves of teachers) have put their emphasis. Truth be told, if a teacher is only going to focus on two of the three areas, I think those are the two to focus on!</p>
<p>That said, while those teachers may continue to be effective by previous measures (and may continue to prepare their students for university entrance requirements), I don&#8217;t think they are truly providing relevant and engaging learning experiences. Until school&#8217;s change what they consider to be effective  to include this third area of knowledge, teachers in general are unlikely to change. Once this shift occurs, though, it&#8217;s nice to think that we will (hopefully) be well ahead of the game!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
